Saturday, February 23, 2019

America is Thirsty!



America is thirsty!


It has been reported that the Mueller report is going to be released as early as next week. When I heard that, my heart fluttered a little bit. Excitement or anxiety? What's your feeling?

What are the possible outcomes? What is the likely outcome?

The report will be released to the Attorney General of the United States, William Barr, who was confirmed just a week or so ago. He has sole discretion as to what to do with it.

We have spent millions and millions of dollars during the two years of this investigation. The public is thirsty for the information. But the AG alone gets to decide. Being the optimist, I want to believe that Attorney General Barr will do the right thing and release the entire report to the public. During his confirmation hearings, he skirted the issue and gave himself plenty of outs.


Who is Attorney General William Barr? I realized I didn't know much about him. Can we predict what he'll do? Will Little Sister Resister stick her Pollyanna neck out to make predictions?

Indulge me as I explore.

This isn't William Barr's first attorney general rodeo. He served as attorney general under Bush the First from 1991-1993. He was a youngster then, only 41 when he took the position. He oversaw the Lockerbie bombing investigation among other investigations.

When he was a mere babe, he worked for the CIA (1973-1977) and also worked in the Reagan administration before being appointed to deputy attorney general and finally attorney general under George H.W. Bush. He was unanimously approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee and confirmed by voice vote in the Senate.

He later worked in the private sector as an attorney for GTE and for a law firm before being tapped by 45 to become attorney general once again. He is Republican, of course, and staunchly conservative. His stints in the federal government have appeared to be honorable, though quite conservative in his views, especially with regard to "law and order," the death penalty, and abortion. Having been in federal government for years, he is definitely part of "The Swamp" and not one of the corrupt inner circle of SCROTUS sycophants. This is a positive.

But Barr has been critical of the Mueller investigation, going so far as to send an unsolicited memo in June, 2018 to U.S. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein asserting his opinions faulting the obstruction of justice angle and siding with 45 having presidential discretion in whom to fire. He had also sent the memo to the Fanta Menace and his attorneys. This is a little bit concerning, but gives one understanding as to why he was picked to be AG.

Despite his criticism of the special counsel, he is reportedly good friends with Robert Mueller. And he has said that it is "vitally important" that the investigation be completed. His mouth noises seem to indicate that he is supportive of the investigation and the public's right to know. During his confirmation hearings, he said, it is “very important” that Congress and the public be informed of the special counsel's findings and, “For that reason, my goal will be to provide as much transparency as I can consistent with the law. I can assure you that, where judgments are to be made by me, I will make those judgments based solely on the law and will let no personal, political, or other improper interests influence my decisions.” He skirted the issue while sounding like he'll do the right thing. When asked if TЯUMP will get a preview and a chance to "correct" the report, Barr said, "That will not happen."

To my mind, we must trust him. So, let the heart flutter be one of excitement.

It's impossible to predict what the report contains. Mueller's team has been extraordinarily buttoned-up and no one knows what is going on. We know plenty of what has already happened, from the indictments and pleas of many in the inner circle. Those investigations and criminal proceedings will continue regardless.

What we don't know is what all will be written about those with surname TЯUMP.

Though it's highly likely that Mueller will abide by the Justice Department policy to not indict a sitting president, my hope is that he is saving the most delicious indictment of all for the pièce de résistance as he releases the report. Donnie Jr. is obviously next in line. And it's possible that there will be a big nothing burger served up when it comes to 45. I just don't want to think that that is possible, though. Just. Not. Possible.

It's also important to remember that the Senate and the House of Representatives are continuing their own investigations, and Mueller's wrap does not mean that those investigations wrap.

What we want: a multi-volume novel detailing every single one of SCROTUS's and his posse's misdeeds, with a big board filled with yarn lines neatly illustrating the nefarious misdoings.

We feel we deserve this after two years of angst and anger. We want justification for our fears. Our sense of Schadenfreude is strong: we want SCROTUS to feel pain. We want something that will get House Democrats off their butts and lead to the removal of 45 from office. Rep. Joe Kennedy (D-MA), a leader who I respect greatly, makes a good point: Our very democracy may depend on the report finding nothing. He wants to believe "that process has the integrity we believe it should have (to rightfully elect our president)." Joe, I hate to tell ya, but that ship has sailed.

What we'll get: who knows.

There are lots of possibilities. The best and most informed analysis of what may come is from Neal Katyal, writing in the New York Times. Mr. Katyal worked under Obama as Acting Solicitor General, and during the Clinton administration, he actually drafted the special counsel regulations which Mueller is relying on. He's a good one to pay attention to.

He predicts it will be rather brief, with its function being a "roadmap" for Congress's investigations and will be considered the "end of the beginning" rather than the beginning of the end. There is no requirement other than "a report." We'd all like this tied up in a neat bow, but it's doubtful. Furthermore, the report may be limited to the original scope of the investigation: what happened with Russia's interference in the 2016 election, including the extent of Traitor Tot's involvement.

A limited, "by the book" roadmap report, Katyal contends, will be more damaging to 45 in the long run. Anything other than 100% clearance (and what are the chances of that??) will be damaging to the President*.

But it's also been asserted (for example in the Washington Post) that there are no hard and fast rules, and nothing precludes a full and robust report. We want that!

Garrett Graff on Wired outlines some possible scenarios. He describes possibilities ranging from a brief letter; to a detailed "road map;" to a full, lengthy, foot-noted report; to an announcement of further indictments, among other -- or a combination -- of scenarios.

No matter the outcome, remember, Congress has subpoena power and can get the report that way, if Barr plays coy with them. The House has powerful oversight powers.

And of course, regardless of the contents of Mueller's report, many other investigations, such as those looking at his business dealings, his taxes, his foundation's misdeeds, his campaign finance ugliness, and the inauguration shadiness have all been put into motion and will continue. There have been plenty of indictments and guilty pleas rising from the Mueller investigation already. Investigations into Cohen, Manafort, Stone: those all stand and will be seen to the end. Papadopolous is in prison, and Flynn is to be sentenced next month. Cohen is reporting to prison in May, and he testifies to Congress next week.

Little Sister Resister's prediction, worth all the pixels it's written in: a lengthy report with additional indictments, and a mostly-complete release to the public (redactions, and censoring of material sensitive to on-going investigations and classified material is to be expected).


In summary, all that is required of Mueller is to provide "a confidential report" to the attorney general, and all that is required of AG Barr is to submit "an explanation" to Congress. They each get to decide what that looks like. We will have to deal with what comes, when it comes. We must hope for the best, but prepare for the worst.

Gee, Little Sister, it took you 1,361 words to say that?!



Meet me back here after. No matter the outcome, we'll share a drink.


Thanks for reading, Sister and Brother Resisters!








Monday, February 18, 2019

Emergency Presidents' Day Demonstration

"Stop the National Emergency"

It was a last-minute, hastily organized demonstration and march, but several hundred Santa Barbarans showed up during lunchtime on Presidents' Day to protest the Fake National Emergency. There were a few extemporaneous citizen speakers and then we took to the streets to march. It was a beautiful day for a demonstration!

I donned my pink pussy hat, luckily able to join in thanks to rearranging my work day. I was only able march part way. And I didn't have a sign. Shoot.

BUT I SHOWED UP! We are citizens ready to take back our democracy!

Here are some pictures.





Saturday, February 16, 2019

I kept yelling "Effer!" at the computer

Gawd. Friday was a frustrating day. All day I was yelling "Effer, Effer Effer!" except I was using the real word and my face was turning red as my blood pressure rose.




The Mango Mussolini finally signed the spending bill, keeping the government open, but he also declared a "national emergency" so that he can divert funds from other programs toward building his Goddam Wall (GDW). It was inevitable that he did this. It's disgusting, illegal, and immoral, so of course it is something he would do.


The saga of the GDW began on the campaign trail, when, in order to give then-candidate TЯUMP a talking point that he could remember, it was suggested that he make a promise to build a wall along the southern border. The New York Times reported that some of his early political advisers (including Roger Stone) came up with the idea of a wall as a mnemonic to remember to talk about immigration (here is another summary from Slate in case you don't subscribe to the NYT).

His rhetoric worked; he was elected by a bunch of people afraid of immigrants. For two years, he had control of both houses of the Legislative Branch and didn't get funding for a wall. He didn't even work very hard for funding for a wall. Few Republicans in Congress, in fact, even wanted to approve the less-than-2-billion that the President* wanted in 2017. For two years, there was no emergency. And there was no emergency declaration.

Once Democrats took control of the House, the GDW turned into an obsession, and one that his base shares. His base includes some nearly-state-run-media figures (are they state-run or is the current administration media-run??): Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, and Rush Limbaugh. So when the new Congress unanimously agreed to pass a spending bill that contained just a fraction of what he wanted for the wall, his media honeys lambasted him for not getting the wall funded and pushed him into the whiny baby government shutdown. And a nation suffered.

I don't have to tell you why the GDW is a stoooopid idea, but in case you've been living in a tree, among other negatives:
The only ones who believe it is a good solution is Adolf Twitler and his ever-shrinking base, and they only believe it because he tells them to believe it.

The talking points about The Goddam Wall have been a moving target. Look at this wonderful word analysis by the New York Times. He first insisted it would be made of concrete, insisted Mexico would pay for it. Then he said it could be made of various materials and be called slats, or fence, or barrier, or "Peaches" and suddenly it's the taxpayers' responsibility. And he shut the government down for 35 days because of it, "proud to own the shutdown" and then blamed the Democrats for the shutdown.

The saga culminated yesterday when he signed the spending bill and declared a national emergency.

Steve Sack


Here is his full speech and press conference. I had difficulty watching it, but I watched it. I did it for you, dear readers; it was my bloggerly duty. It was painful. It's 50 minutes I won't ever get back. But I did it. My advice to you: save your mental health; don't bother.




Instead, read one of the fact-checking articles instead. It will still raise your blood pressure, make you say the F-word, and make your face red, but at least it gives you the comfort that there are rational people finding the facts and looking out for the best interest of our country.

Here are some fact-checking articles. Thank you, First Amendment!

My observations:

He started by talking about China. Huh?? And spoke for several minutes about foreign policy issues, from Brexit to Syria to North Korea. Then he rambled about the economy (rather, the stock market, which is his only measure of the economy -- he touted the Dow's growth but really it's been overall flat for the last year).

He talked for 15 minutes before he finally got to the GDW and the "national emergency." By way of proof that the GDW is needed, he strived for confirmation that things were better in El Paso after a barrier was built by asking the crowd at his recent rally there. "And I asked them; I said, 'Let me ask you the -- as a crowd, when the wall went up, was it better? You were there, some of you.'" The crowd, made up of his base, apparently confirmed his lies. He seems to be taking part in (pardon the crudeness, but there is nothing about this "presidency" that isn't crude) a circle jerk. He continued with his remarks, making the same mouth mumblings about menacing Mexicans moving in to make white people's lives miserable -- or murder them madly.

He talked about the precedent of emergency declarations by past presidents, but he didn't really seem to understand what they were about. They were NOT about the president's shameless grab of power, going around Congress to usurp spending for a pet project.

He wandered back to the subject of China for a while, and made the case for the death penalty for drug dealers, which is what his good friend President Xi does in China. Yeah, let's look to China for moral and legal guidance. <eye roll>

At about 22:08 in the video above, it got a little weird. He thanked everybody for coming and said almost off-handedly, "We're gonna have a national emergency" with less enthusiasm than he had when he announced HAMBERDERS FOR ALL in the Whitewash House. And then in a sing-songy voice reminiscent of third grade, he recited what would happen next: "And we will have a national emergency, and we will then be sued, and they will sue us in the 9th Circuit, even though it shouldn't be there, and we will possibly get a bad ruling, and then we'll get another bad ruling, and then we'll end up in the Supreme Court, and hopefully we'll get a fair shake and we'll win in the Supreme Court." It's probably the most truthful part of his speech, except the winning in the Supreme Court. The Constitution is clear. The Congress decides on spending. Period. The President cannot do anything he wants. That is not how our government works. We already rebelled against a king who wanted to grab money for spurious reasons, remember?

After his rambling 24 minutes of remarks, he took questions from the press. At about 40:00, he was asked to cite his sources for his statistics and facts about crime at the border, and he got extremely agitated. Once again, facts don't matter. They are inconveniences.

During one answer, he stated, "I could do the wall over a longer period of time, I didn't need to do this, but I'd rather do it much faster. And I don't have to do it for the election; I've already done a lot of wall for the election 2020. And the only reason we're up here talking about this is because of the election, because they want to try and win an election which it looks like they're not going to be able to do." A federal judge in the near future is going to be quite interested in that answer about this "emergency."

Directly after the press conference, he boarded Air Force One and went on vacation to Mar-a-Lago. Some emergency!

So, what's next?

He was right: Lawsuits will be filed. California is planning a lawsuit. The ACLU is planning a lawsuit. Texas landowners are planning a lawsuit with the help of Public Citizen. Democrats in Washington are planning lawsuits or legislation to fight this declaration.

His party is fracturing over the non-emergency.

Ann Coulter still hates him.


And in the meantime....

We do have a legitimate national emergency. It's called Donald Trump.

Clay Jones



Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Racism is man's gravest threat to man - the maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason.

"Racism is man's gravest threat to man - the maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason." -Abraham Joshua Heschel

Racism is a painful part of the American fabric. It's been in the national dialogue in a big way since the Racist-in-Chief sought the presidency. In the last few weeks, it's been a front-and-center issue.

I talked about 45's racism and other-isms in general in several posts, but most directly in my post, Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that (June 12, 2017), about the uptick in the audacity that racists have shown after the election of their Messiah, leading to an increase in hate crimes.

In the last few weeks, racism has been all over the front pages. Over the weekend, The Drumpf Family continued racist rants against Native Americans as they taunted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

First, the tweet from Don the Con:

And the bullying continued with Donny Jr reacting on Instagram, writing, "Savage!!! Love my President.

The all-caps "TRAIL," of course, is a sick reference to the Trail of Tears, a death march which wiped out thousands of Native Americans who were forced to walk to a new reserve. Now just a convenient racist jab.

These people are despicable.


Freshman Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) made an offensive tweet with an anti-Semitic trope this week. Her party members came down hard on her, and she issued a prompt and effective apology. The Angry Creamsicle called for her resignation, calling her apology "lame." This, from the man who has never once apologized for his hundreds of insults and racist and misogynistic taunts.


What got more coverage, however, was that Democratic Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam was found to have dressed in blackface during medical school, as evidenced by a yearbook photo of a "minstrel" in blackface standing next to a robed KKK member. In a bizarre news conference, he denied that the particular photo was him (after saying it was him earlier), but admitted that he had dressed in blackface as part of a Michael Jackson costume, that he rocked the moonwalk, and was about to demonstrate the dance when his wife stopped him. Can't make this up.

The President*  tweeted outrage, but not necessarily for the racism aspect. To him, it's just a part of the competition.



For a little history about blackface in entertainment, please watch this piece from CBS a few months ago. If you are like me, perhaps you haven't completely understood the cultural ramifications.





As always, our satirists rise to the challenge of dealing with these difficulties.








Gov. Northam has stated that he is not going to resign, despite calls from Democrats far and wide. Others have argued that "some of our best friends were racists" and want to perhaps give the governor a bit of a pass on this one, because what he is doing NOW is what counts. Here is one opinion, by John Blake at CNN. (aside: In another essay, Blake shows how racism and racial bias is insidious -- and rampant.)


I am torn in my views. Yes, his actions matter now. But what's wrong is wrong, and there must be consequences. And as a Democrat, he mustn't be hypocritical. None of us should. We always must stand up for what is right. It's odious, but is the blackface mockery the worst racist act, necessitating resignation?

I am of the mind to strongly condemn those actions, offer a censure, but but more strongly condemn -- and call for resignation for --  the racist actions that do the most harm:



The upside to the Virginia chaos is that this is a teachable moment, putting racism and racist acts in the national consciousness. We're learning and growing as a country. Still. That's a positive.

What we must do going forward: continue to learn how to reverse our tendencies toward bias. Acknowledge our white privilege. Learn about other cultures; continue to be an ally and an advocate. Call out racism when you see it. Acknowledge that "The Civil Rights Era" isn't a time 50 years ago. It's now.

It's Black History Month. Embrace it. Learn some black history! Check out Rachel Elizabeth Cargle's instagram this month for prompts on what to learn about. Learn, grow, change.

And Resist!













Thursday, February 7, 2019

STFU

The nation's 96th State of the Union Address (SOTU, or for the current administration, STFU) was spoken Tuesday night.

Doing my bloggerly duty, I watched it, but most of it sounded like this to me:



...and I felt like this little boy named Trump:




Below is the address in full, and here is an annotated transcript from The New York Times, and there are also annotated/fact-checked transcripts from Politico and from NBC.


Full speech:




I tried to pay attention enough to take a few notes, and then I turned toward smarter people's responses.

A few of my initial thoughts.

Overall, he managed to read the words real good. Yay for an extra week of practice! He did continue his marathon-heavy breathing as he has done in recent speeches. Although I was on the look-out, I didn't see any concerning speech traits this time, other than possibly some inconsistent hypernasal resonance. Still gonna watch for alarming speech trends.


"If there is going to be peace and legislation, there cannot be war and investigation."
Was there laughter or shocked murmurs in the gallery during his "if the glove doesn't fit you must acquit" moment when he called for an end to the investigations? If there wasn't laughter in the Capitol building, there was laughter in my house. Don't hold your breath, honey. Legislation and peace are coming because of investigations! Our Members of Congress are pretty smart and talented. I think they can handle the job.


"No issue better illustrates the divide between America’s working class and America's political class than illegal immigration. Wealthy politicians and donors push for open borders while living their lives behind walls and gates and guards." Typical of the right-wing, he used a false comparison between his beloved wall and gates to private residences.


"In the last two years, our brave ICE officers made 266,000 arrests of criminal aliens, including those charged or convicted of nearly 100,000 assaults. 30,000 sex crimes, and 4,000 killings or murders." His charged immigration talk went on a long time, not surprisingly, with questionable "facts" about the number of criminals crossing into the U.S. to murder us in our sleep.


"It is unacceptable that Americans pay vastly more than people in other countries for the exact same drugs, often made in the exact same place. This is wrong, unfair, and together we can stop it. And we will stop it fast." I loved the look on McConnell's face with SCROTUS talked about lowering pharmaceutical prices.

Awww...am I gonna lose my big pharma lunch money?
Big Pharma donated over $80,000 to McConnell last year, and over $800,000 in the last 10 years. You think drug price legislation is going to pass the Senate? Hell no. Not until we get corporate money out of politics.

Did you find his segues -- or lack of them -- a little bizarre?

After he introduced the little girl with cancer and talked about her treatment, there was a non-sequitur stuffed in there with no follow-up. One sentence and then off to the next topic:

Thank you, Grace. You are a great inspiration to everyone in this room. Thank you very much. Many childhood cancers have not seen new therapies in decades.

My budget will ask Congress for $500 million over the next 10 years to fund this critical life-saving research. To help support working parents, the time has come to pass school choice for America's children. 
I am also proud to be the first president to include in my budget a plan for nationwide paid family leave— so that every new parent has the chance to bond with their newborn child.

And later with not even a tiny pause between subjects:

And let us reaffirm a fundamental truth — all children — born and unborn— are made in the holy image of God. The final part of my agenda is to protect America's national security.
Okayyyy....



"If I had not been elected president of the United States, we would right now, in my opinion, be in a major war with North Korea."
What the what? STOOOOPID!


There were positives: honoring WWII veterans and Holocaust survivors, as well as a police officer who rushed toward danger during the synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh. These people were right to be honored, and it was moving.


The Democratic women were striking! It was so wonderful to see all the Democratic women dressed in suffragette white, especially when they spontaneously started cheering on each other and themselves and the "USA! USA!" when 45 noted that there are more women in Congress than ever before.

And Nancy Pelosi rocked it again. From her eye-rolls to her smirks to the "Fuck You Clap" -- she is a power to be reckoned with!



(Here are the best Tweets about her clap.)

Now, smarter people's response:

Stacy Abrams gave a strong Democratic response:




Vladimir Putin:



...and the best summary and analysis, from Stephen Colbert:





And more the best of the Tweets. I love Americans!